// Phase 5 · Reports

Reports & recommendations

Generate board-ready reports that pull together every module, baseline diagnostic, Canvas scores, leadership alignment, behavioural KPIs, roadmap, pulse diagnostics and implementation. Tailor each section with AI, then export to PDF or an editable Word document.

// Whole-of-Canvas overview

Executive summary

Water Authority · Utilities & Infrastructure

Baseline diagnosticCanvas scoresLeadership alignmentBehavioural KPIsRoadmapPulse diagnosticsImplementation tracker

Showing a templated draft compiled from your module data. Generate to tailor every section with AI.

Current state

  • The baseline diagnostic has not been completed yet, complete the Assessment module to populate readiness scores.
  • Leadership Frame position: Natural equilibrium (moderate certainty, mixed agreement).
  • 3 role-modelling commitment(s) and 1 priority mindset(s) are defined.
  • 1 KPI set(s) link ESG commitments to shared organisation, team and individual measures.
  • Embed a Just Transition into every major capital programme, shift: From deciding for communities to deciding with them.
  • Overall change difficulty is 57/100 (Medium).
  • Context: 55/100.
  • Scale: 70/100.
  • Strength: 48/100.
  • Belief: 40/100.
  • 2 behavioural milestone(s) mapped against ESG milestones.
  • Implementation cycle 1. Overall pulse: 52/100 (Watch).
  • Cultural health check: 58/100 (Watch).
  • Belief sentiment check: 45/100 (Watch).
  • Change readiness check: 52/100 (Watch).
  • 3 tactical action(s) in flight; 0 done, 0 blocked.

Strengths

  • Leaders have committed: I will visibly model the behaviours we ask of everyone else
  • Leaders have committed: I will name when a decision conflicts with our stated purpose
  • Leaders have committed: I will protect time and psychological safety for this work
  • Shared accountability defined for "Embed a Just Transition into every major capital programme" (owner: ESG Director).
  • Early in the cycle, protect momentum on actions now in progress.

Gaps

  • No critical gaps identified from the current data.

Risks

  • Co-designed Just Transition plan in place for every major capital programme: Affected communities feel done-to rather than involved (High risk, affects Affected communities and customers).

Recommendations

  • Embed the priority mindset: Lead with curiosity over certainty, treat ESG as adaptive, not technical, work
  • Track "Every delivery team runs at least one community co-design session per programme stage" (Quarterly) to make collaboration on this commitment visible.
  • For "Co-designed Just Transition plan in place for every major capital programme", land the behaviour: Leaders and teams routinely decide with communities, not for them.
  • For "Shared ESG accountability embedded in team operating rhythms", land the behaviour: Teams own collective ESG measures instead of siloed targets.
  • Managers in operations need support holding honest conversations about the change
  • Belief is lowest where teams feel the change was decided for them

Priority actions

  • Confirm owner and first review for "100% of major programmes have a co-designed Just Transition plan by year end".
  • [Now (0–3 months)] Leaders and teams routinely decide with communities, not for them, owner: ESG Director.
  • [Next (3–6 months)] Teams own collective ESG measures instead of siloed targets, owner: People & Culture Lead.

Suggested leadership messages

  • Name where we sit on the Leadership Frame (Natural equilibrium) and what it asks of us.
  • As leaders, i will visibly model the behaviours we ask of everyone else
  • As leaders, i will name when a decision conflicts with our stated purpose
  • Leaders to attend the first co-design session and listen, not present
  • Exec sponsor to remove the resourcing blocker on the pilot programme

Suggested next steps

  • Lift belief sentiment in operations through visible 'you said, we did' loops
  • Scale co-design beyond the pilot programme